Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Harlan1196
Don’t know if it was against the law.

@O.C.G.A. 16-10-94 (2010)

16-10-94. Tampering with evidence
(a) A person commits the offense of tampering with evidence when, with the intent to prevent the apprehension or cause the wrongful apprehension of any person or to obstruct the prosecution or defense of any person, he knowingly destroys, alters, conceals, or disguises physical evidence or makes, devises, prepares, or plants false evidence.

So what do you think now?

365 posted on 03/08/2012 7:54:51 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies ]


To: philman_36

How did he conceal his BC? He refused to participate in an administrative hearing and was prepared to accept a default judgement.

Since he willing to accept a guilty verdict then how can you say he was obstructing the prosecution? He made the prosecution’s job easier.


366 posted on 03/08/2012 8:12:29 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson