No, the original point was you claimed "the drug lords will not lose their businesses, they will expand them, they will become the next Phillip-Morris."
So go ahead and please one at a time repeat your ‘point’.
"the last thing a money launderer will do is call attention to the laundering enterprise with terrorizing violence. No support there for your anti-legalization Chicken Little-isms."
"Did that someone say that barriers to competition are universal? Or impregnable? Did they indicate what might be the barriers to competition in selling dried plant matter?"
"at most they'd own a "substantial" (whatever that means) share of the distribution business - no room there for "lacing with addictive additives," any more than alcohol distibutors do now."
"Is it OK if he's drunk while doing those things [working anywhere near where my car brakes are getting fixed, where my airplane is getting maintenance, where anything that affects my safety and my family’s safety is taking place]? If not, to make sure he isn't would it be a good policy to enact a general blanket ban on alcohol?"
All of your so-called ‘points’ are answered in Post #97.