Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: JustSayNoToNannies

>>Nobody uses THC intravenously.

Unless they’re being administered controlled amounts in a manner that reduces variability of absorption in a research environment.

>>nothing you or I need to fear.

Uhuh. That’s what the hippytards were telling my dazed and confuzed friends back in the 70’s too.

Having observed the wreckage of the lives of those who believed that bullshyte and proceeded to self-medicate themselves into oblivion -— NO SALE.


113 posted on 03/07/2012 8:01:16 PM PST by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: LomanBill
the psychological effects of synthetic intravenous THC in healthy subjects.

Nobody uses THC intravenously.

Unless they’re being administered controlled amounts in a manner that reduces variability of absorption in a research environment.

They reduced variability at the expense of real-life applicability of their results - they're like the guy who lost his wallet on Second Street but is looking for it on Third Street because the light is better there.

Over 2 experimental sessions, participants (N=22) were administered 2.5mg IV THC

Even aside from the unrealistic route of administration, how does this dose compares to the amount a recreational user of strong weed would get? Rats get cancer from artificial sweetener when fed the equivalent of a million cans of diet soda - should we worry?

No response to this point?

Following THC, there was a significant increase in self-rated and observer-rated positive psychotic symptoms which were highly correlated (r=0.62, p=0.001).

In research terminology, "significant" means only statistically distinguishable from no effect - it says nothing about the magnitude of the effect.

No response to this point?

Phenomena centered on de-synchronisation of self-agency (ipseity disturbance) and hypersalience/paranoia.

While these may technically fall under the general heading of "psychotic," a smoker hiding under the bed or examining his fingers in wonder ("ipseity disturbance") is nothing you or I need to fear.

Uhuh. That’s what the hippytards were telling my dazed and confuzed friends back in the 70’s too.

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Having observed the wreckage of the lives of those who believed that bullshyte and proceeded to self-medicate themselves into oblivion -— NO SALE.

Did they self-medicate themselves into a fear-worthy sort of psychosis? If not, your observations have no bearing on the research you cited.

114 posted on 03/08/2012 7:36:16 AM PST by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson