Really? Is it not possible to determine a forgery by means not requiring examining the original? You apparently are blowing smoke again. Ask Dan Rather about forged documents being exposed from an internet copy. Sighted Obot Sank Same.
So Dan Rather was convicted in court? A real court accepted those “facts” into official evidence? I don’t even remember Dan Rather being charged with a crime.
I thought you wanted to get Obama into court. Don’t you think you need to have evidence that would actually be accepted as probative evidence?