Klayman pandered and solicited FReepers for cash on behalf of their legal fees
And?! Did they get no service whatsoever or what?! Half statements don't get me any closer to resolution.
@DON ADAMS UPDATE: Urgent Help Needed on Appeal
Much had been written on Free Republic's web site about the problems we encountered in dealing with Larry Klayman, Esq., particularly the year long battle we fought to gain possession of our case file from his firm.
Who did what?
Reply #101 @Larry Klayman sues Judicial Watch
The dispute went public when the Adamses' new lawyers--Samuel C. Stretton of Philadelphia and Joseph M. Adams of Doylestown--complained in court papers that the Judicial Watch lawyers had refused to turn over their files unless they were paid. They asked Yohn to terminate Judicial Watch's attorney retaining lien.
In response, Judicial Watch attorneys Paul J. Orfanedes and Larry Klayman told Yohn they had a valid claim for more than $208,000 in fees and expenses "for the tremendous time, effort and resources it expended," including 30 depositions, hundreds of interrogatories and successfully defeating several motions for dismissal."
In their agreement with the Adamses, they said, any termination by the Adamses "entitles Judicial Watch to be compensated immediately on a quantum meruit basis."
do a little search and see how Larry treats our own
Any other suggestions on what I should look for in particular?
@Lots of links there.
And they won in the end! CLINTON PROTESTORS WIN TEN YEAR LEGAL BATTLE WITH TEAMSTERS
But let's cut right to the chase...Hey, Teri...what gives? Did Klayman rip ya'll off?
Lawsuits also have been filed against Fitton in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia by a Judicial Watch donor, Louise Benson, and a former director of the group's Miami district office, Sandy Cobas, who also names Judicial Watch in her suit.
Things are much clearer now.
Klayman is a dirtbag ........ he took their money and when it ran out so did Klayman
.