To: Harlan1196
This Court finds the decision and analysis of Arkeny persuasive.That does 
not answer my question. 
Once again...Did Malihi 
refute the definition of NBC in Minor and state why he did so? 
Your reply only raises another question...Since when has a State case ever held precedent over a SCOTUS case?
 
255 posted on 
02/19/2012 7:58:34 AM PST by 
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
 
To: philman_36
WKA as encapsulated in Ankeny is settled law. It does not need to be re-argued - merely applied.
The core of Ankeny is WKA. WKA is the law of the land.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson