"I have a feeling that she has some demands on her time, and a lot of them have financial benefit attached to them," Santorum, who will be at CPAC, told conservative commentator S.E. Cupp.
Further, Santorum then noted that Palin likely had "other business opportunities," seemingly implying that the former Alaska governor's standard $100,000 speaking fees for her "prior obligations" were more important to her.
Sarah was asked to respond. From an ABC article: Palin, who declined a chance to deliver the closing-night keynote speech at the convention, responded to Santorum in an Fox News interview Wednesday night. I will not call him the knuckle dragging Neanderthal that perhaps others would want to call him, Palin said of Santorum, Ill let his wife call him that instead" I hope Sarah doesn't forget this petty man.
Rick's supporters will NOT read anything negative about him. I wonder why. I read Rick's platform, I researched his position on the 2nd Amendment (horrible). I sincerely wish people would go back and look at Rick's pronouncements over the past 18 months. There is no overriding concern about the horrible fiscal mess we are in. He seems obsessed with "purifying" our Republic and not at all concerned with government as inherently evil. Rick does not have a view our Founders had -- that government is inherently evil.
Rick recently has been moving to parrot a lot of what Newt's being speaking about. Newt's platform is very specific. Rick's recently has changed some things to reflect more "fiscal concern"
He is a social conservative and at most a fiscal moderate.
Rick’s supporters will NOT read anything negative about him. I wonder why.
Both set of supporters believe their candidate is best. This is not that unusual.