“You said we should cooperate them, then said 2/3 of their philosophy is inhuman, and I really dont see how doing that will get them to the table.
Half of those morality issues dont harm people who arent interested in being harmed, so why does the government need to enforce that morality?”
Yes, I confronted them about the inhumanity of their foreign and social policy. That should get them to the table, to defend their positions, and hopefully conclude that their positions are indefensible.
I completely disagree that half of these morality issues don’t harm people. That is a ridiculous assertion. They are devastating to the human race.
I said they dont harm people who want it. We dont need to make laws to protect people’s souls or protect them from harming themselves on the basis that it makes people feel better about themselves. That is no different than using government to take tax money and give it out and calling it charity.