Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: JustSayNoToNannies

“It would help.

Not the question. Again: would that satisfy you? “

Please see my full answer:

-It would help. But I support the arrest, and the removal of driving privileges from, EVERY person who drives impaired. Whether they are impaired from alcohol, pot, or speed.-

So no, AS I SAID, it would not fully satisfy me, I want people who deliberately drive impaired arrested for it. Even if they haven’t done any property damage or hurt or killed anyone (yet).


280 posted on 02/17/2012 6:22:07 PM PST by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies ]


To: Persevero
It would help.

Not the question. Again: would that satisfy you?

Please see my full answer

I did, as you know because I responded to the rest of your answer:

But I support the arrest, and the removal of driving privileges from, EVERY person who drives impaired.

The issue is not impaired driving but your imposition-of-costs argument. Again: I'm talking about innocent people suffering and dying in accidents that wouldn't have happened if the car wasn't on the road. Are you willing to continue imposing those costs on others for your right to drive (unimpaired) for the sake of driving?

Your reply?

281 posted on 02/21/2012 11:58:51 AM PST by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson