So why do you keep ignoring the ENTIRE post you cherry picked that ONE sentence from? Every other sentence before and after deals explicitly about eligibility. Only a fool would believe that the sentence right in the middle would not be about eligibility.
Why don’t you cite the entire post?
Slither away, snake.
Why are you talking to us - shouldn't you be on the phone to the Georgia SoS explaining to him how no one in his office knows how to do their jobs? Maybe he will give you a job.
A "personal dig" and nothing more! Nothing of merit whatsoever. It's not even funny.
You have shown ability to gather an impressive collection of legal minutia. You have also shown an impressive ability to be wrong on every issue every time - for three years now.
Where you torpedoed your own boat.
I will make a fearless prediction - this case will go no further. If appealed it will lose. At every level. Every time. And your collection of laws will not change that simple fact.
So there ya go. Nothing but 1) slights, 2) personal attacks and 3) conjecture.
Every other sentence before and after deals explicitly about eligibility. Only a fool would believe that the sentence right in the middle would not be about eligibility.
Your first sentence set the tone in which you intended the whole reply to be taken. Only a fool would think that what you're saying now is true.