[philman_36]

I just ask that you not make it a litmus test.
How am I making the eligibility issue a litmus test?
I've not told anybody that they must believe as I do on this issue or they're not a conservative. That is the reason that there is thread after thread here at FR where each side tries to convince others through convincing arguments that they're correct on the issue and the other side isn't.
So don't you dare try to conflate the two issues of eligibility and you blatantly lying about me into one single thing. You're not that crafty.

And while I'm venting...even though the issue appears to be far from settled people like you strut around doing some premature "happy dance" as if this were all finished so everybody should just sit down, shut up and take "it up the old wazoo" simply because "everybody doesn't agree with you".

One can be a conservative and not accept the eligibility argument.
You can be an absolute buffoon and not accept that either.

[Harlan1196]

I didn’t lie about you. I said that every eligibility theory you support has failed every case, every time.

You have yet to prove me wrong.

You taking a single sentence from a post that talk exclusively about eligibility that was in a entire conversation about eligibility and twisting that into an attack on every single one of your beliefs - well come on, you call that a honest debating tactic? You went out of your way to create something to get outraged over so you could launch an all out attack on me. That is not how honorable men act.

With that, I am done. I suggest we simply ignore each other.