[philman_36]

Correction... § 9-11-43 - Evidence (c) Determination of the law of other jurisdictions. A party who intends to raise an issue concerning the law of another state or of a foreign country shall give notice in his pleadings or other reasonable written notice. The court, in determining such law, may consider any relevant material or source, including testimony, whether or not submitted by a party or admissible under the rules of evidence. The court's determination shall be treated as a ruling on a question of law.

[4Zoltan]

"The court, in determining such law, may consider any relevant material or source, including testimony, whether or not submitted by a party or admissible under the rules of evidence. The court's determination shall be treated as a ruling on a question of law. " Wouldn't this include Ankney and also the BC submitted by Van Irion in Case #1 in deciding case #2. This may be why Hatfield's appeal is DOA.