You just described yourself. Just another coincidence?
Two days in a row, you post at the same times of those filthy messages, but then while those nasty message are being posted, you disappear. Just another coincidence?
Posted on 02/07/2012 11:38:23 AM PST by Red Steel
Attorney Mark Hatfield's Response to Georgia Secretary of State
Below is the ending portion of Attorney Hatfield's 6-page rebuttal letter to the Georgia Secretary of State. Read the whole letter!
"Please note that the foregoing cited errors, omissions, and flaws in Judge Malihi's "Decision" are not intended to be exhaustive, and Plaintiffs specifically reserve the right to raise other claims of error hereafter.
Mr. Secretary, as you deliberate on your final determination of Defendant Obama's qualifications to seek and hold office, I am requesting, on behalf of my clients, that you consider the posture of these matters. Defendant Obama has initiated the submission of his name as a candidate to be listed on the Georgia Democratic Presidential Ballot. Likewise, in accordance with their rights under Georgia law, my clients have raised a challenge to the Defendant's qualifications as a "natural born Citizen" pursuant to Article II of the United States Constitution. The Defendant and his lawyer tried, unsuccessfully, to have my clients' challenges dismissed. The Defendant was then legally served with a Notice to Produce, requiring him to appear at trial and to bring certain documents and items of evidence with him. The Defendant did not object. When the time for trial was imminent, the Defendant's lawyer wrote a letter to you in which he boldly criticized and attacked the judge and in which he stated that he and his client were refusing to come to court. The day of trial, after you warned him that his failure to appear would be at his own peril, the Defendant and his lawyer nevertheless failed to appear for court and failed to comply with the Plaintiffs' valid Notice to Produce. The Defendant thus not only presented no evidence of his own, but he failed to produce significant pieces of evidence to which Plaintiffs were legally entitled. Inexplicably, Judge Malihi, after verbally acknowledging Plaintiffs' entitlement to a "default judgment," then entered an order fully favorable to the recalcitrant Defendant, and to top it off, the judge refused to even acknowledge Plaintiffs' attempts to have Defendant held accountable for his purposefully contemptuous behavior in ignoring Plaintiffs' Notice to Produce.
Doesn't this result sound unreasonable? Doesn't this result appear on its face unfair? Doesn't this result in fact suggest that the Defendant is above the law?
Mr. Secretary, I am respectfully requesting on behalf of my clients that you render a decision in this matter that treats Defendant Obama no different than any other candidate seeking access to the Georgia ballot who fails and refuses to present evidence of his or her qualifications for holding office and who disregards the authority of our judiciary. I request that my clients' challenges to Defendant Obama's qualifications be sustained and upheld.
Finally, in view of the rapidly approaching Presidential Preference Primary in Georgia on March 6, 2012, I respectfully request that you enter a decision in these matters on an expedited basis."
READ THE FULL LETTER DEBUNKING THE DECISION BY JUDGE MALIHI HERE. IT ALSO DEBUNKS CLAIMS MADE BY OTHERS.
Note: An Article II Legal Defense Fund has been established to support legal actions to help reinstate a Constitutional Presidency, per Article II, Section 1. These actions may include civil or criminal complaints, lawsuits in multiple jurisdictions, including, but not limited to: direct eligibility challenges, ballot challenges, indirect suits against third parties, which would seek to clarify eligibility, or inhibit parties from supporting actions that benefit ineligible candidates and/or officials.
I do tend to put only the key parts of quotes in, as I dislike reading overlong posts where I have to skim to find the relevant portions. I have also commented on others who post irrelevant material, so I have no wish to be guilty of that sin. I will cite or link however, so anyone can find the full material.
As to answering the question you asked of another poster, I’d want a very specific question to answer - looking at the back and forth over several posts in that section, there are several questions involved. But thanks for the vote of (semi) confidence.
You do your fellow FReepers a great service if you provide links. I myself am guilty over the years of not providing more links. Frustration on my part at lack of interest and seeming apathy is a poor excuse for not doing better, and what is right and proper, myself.
And with that I bid you good night.
I have not sent you a single FReepmail. Don’t you think the moderator can check those things?
The end result will still be a loss.
What a reach. Ok then - I guess we are really done with this. See you around.
No, on second thought...please stay. Don't fade to black and come back yet again under some new screen name.
That way I can ensure your infamy follows you.
His SOP - sling crap and when the crap is proven 10,000 times to be lies, he says “see you around”.
And then, of course, there are the psychotic filthy freepmails by his “evil twin”.
Oh, I’m sure it’s just a strange anomaly that someone with a name almost exactly like yours writes nastygrams to me and Brown Deer, with this thread as a subject line. Just one of those oddities.
Yea - it is almost as if a petty, mean spirited stalker set up a sock puppet to get me banned. Fortunately the Admin Moderator was able to take care of things before it got out of hand.
So lets get this straight - I make a barely noticeable change to my name so I can send you messages that would get me banned? Is that the logic here?
So what did the Admin Moderator say when you alerted on me?
You are a true piece of work.
The only actual question in my mind is what was your previous screen name. Secondary question would be is if you have a Fogow name.
Regarding your evil twin, I could give a rip.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.