Less harmful is still harmful.
Less harmful also means more time before the breaking point is reached. That means more pain overall.
We need to reach that point sooner rather than later so we can fix what is really broken.
Yep. Time for the bad tooth to be pulled.
Exactly. True Conservatives know the Federal government is heading to insolvency. The sooner we fix the problem the better it will be. Mitt would just delay the fix at least 4 more years. He would be a failure as President and likely usher in another Marxist.
The true solution lies in the crisis of such magnitude that the "several States" gather and vote to dissolve the Federal Union. The current socialist Federal government can then be replaced by a strict Constitutional Republic.
The dissolution will not be pretty, but it will quickly accomplish the removal of almost all Federal Agencies, the firing are very large numbers of Federal parasites, the dissolution of all Federal Courts except the Supreme Court (to rid the lower courts of Marxists). Remember, the Congress created all the lower courts.
A reconstituted Republic can quickly rebound and unleash the energy of a free people.
My reading of history tells me a solution that is much different that Mark Levin's. He says we took 80 years to get here (socialism) and it will take 80 years to get back to Liberty. I say societies that are heavily socialistic cannot transition to Liberty over time. Liberty (from Socialism) can only be realized in a relatively quick time frame(few years)
In order to defeat the bureaucratic class, they must be dislodged all at once and in a short timeframe. If not, they will work around those seeking Liberty. The only way I see a solution for the U.S. is for the States to dissolve the current Federal union.
Now, the trillion dollar question is how do you get leadership at the State level with true political Warrior spine and second, the circumstances that would warrant such drastic action. Short of that, I think a long decline to a Socialist third world sewer is in our future.
“Less harmful is still harmful.”
Yes, and more harmful is still more harmful.
If you vote for the lesser of two evils, you can get less evil. I’d rather less evil than more evil.