Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: El Sordo
You're the self anointed legal beagle. I'll let you explain to the rest of the group what it means when a fact is stipulated in a court of law.

And you seem to unable to comprehend this simplest point. Orly did not stipulate that Obama was born in Hawaii. Whatever the previous two attorneys said does not bind her case.

She stipulated that Obama's location of birth is in question. You may argue that the first two attorneys stipulated Hawaii, but Orly did not. His ruling cannot encompass all three cases because the facts as stipulated in the first two cases cannot bind the third case where such "facts" are in dispute.

68 posted on 02/05/2012 6:31:58 PM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

Orly should have no trouble with her appeal then.


84 posted on 02/05/2012 9:41:59 PM PST by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson