Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Seizethecarp

You evaded my question...you wrote. “WKA was decided correctly”.

How was it decided correctly? Was it a correct decision giving citizenship to the children of aliens or an alien parent?

How is this a correct decision?


59 posted on 02/04/2012 5:53:53 PM PST by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: bushpilot1
“Was it a correct decision giving citizenship to the children of aliens or an alien parent?”

I evaded nothing. I explained the ruling, IIUC, as interpreting the 14A to have made WKA a 14A citizen at birth, a new subclass of citizens at birth that needed clarification after the passage of the 14A. This is the subclass of citizens at birth, children of aliens and foreigners, about which the Minor court said there were doubts, but which could not reach to resolve at the time.

WKA was correct in resolving those doubts in favor of WKA being a 14A citizen at birth, IMO.

70 posted on 02/04/2012 6:34:03 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: bushpilot1
Was it a correct decision giving citizenship to the children of aliens or an alien parent?

Yes, but not natural born citizenship.

99 posted on 02/04/2012 10:43:42 PM PST by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson