Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers

Mr Rogers, you said:

“,,,No. It merely means that anyone born in the USA of parents here legally IS a natural born citizen allowed to run for President...”

in which you included the words “of parents here legally”.

But Judge Mahili’s decision said:

“...For the purposes of this analysis, this Court considered that President Barack Obama was born in the United States. Therefore, as discussed in Arkeny, he became a citizen at birth and is a natural born citizen....”

which does not seem to require the birth parents to be here legally. So it would allow “anchor babies” to be considered natural born citizens as well as it would some of the US citizen Islamic Jihadists our Predators have been targeting.

There’s no need to sugarcoat this anti-Constitutional decision.


25 posted on 02/04/2012 4:25:12 PM PST by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: House Atreides
Not only anchor babies, but according to this ruling, an actual real life foreign prince is now eligible to be our Commander in Chief.

Think about that!

26 posted on 02/04/2012 4:29:44 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: House Atreides

According to WKA, the parents need to be here “in amity” with the government for them to be NBS/NBC. Arguably, those here ILLEGALLY are not here in amity with the US government.

My suspicion is that ANYONE born in the US will be considered a NBC - but this Georgia decision doesn’t drive that.


28 posted on 02/04/2012 4:33:45 PM PST by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson