Seeing that both cases were wrongly decided, why should we be interested in a chain of bad facts and bad reasoning? It would be tantamount to suggesting we should concern ourselves with a decision based on Roe v Wade and Kelo v New London.
They are crap, and therefore so is a decision based on them. Garbage in, Garbage out.
You can call them crap, but you cannot win in court that way. To be honest, tho, it seems you cannot win in court EVEN WHEN THE OTHER SIDE DOESN’T SHOW UP. I actually thought you had a better case than that, but I was wrong.