Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Seizethecarp
If the plaintiffs took the default, Malihi's recommendation to SOS Kemp would not show that Barry was ineligible to be POTUS, but only that he failed to defend having his name on the ballot.

Unchallenged allegations of fact are to be accepted as verities. IOW, what you don't deny; you admit.

99 posted on 02/07/2012 7:08:25 AM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: SeaHawkFan

“Unchallenged allegations of fact are to be accepted as verities. IOW, what you don’t deny; you admit.”

IIUC that is NOT true in an ALJ hearing. The ALJ has broad discretion regarding what claims in the pleadings are credible and probative.

IIUC, if the defendant doesn’t show up for an eligibility hearing, the ALJ grants the statutory remedy requested by the plaintiffs which was removal of Barry from the ballot...period. A default removal from the ballot would NOT have been a ruling that the defendant candidate was ineligible, only that the candidate didn’t show up to defend that eligibility as required by statute.

No facts or testimony are found by the court to be factual in the event of a default.


100 posted on 02/07/2012 9:20:41 AM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson