Note to future NBC constitutionalist litigants...that includes you, Dr. Taitz:
Place on the witness stand a Juris Doctor specializing in “legal construction” who also has a Ph.D. in English (preferably from Haaavard...there have got to be several available) who can testify to the proper straight up grammatical parsing of the MvH NBC language. Of course, this expert would be screened to exclude Marxists and fellow-travelors!
Such an expert would be able to survive a “Daubert challenge” hearing on his qualifications as an expert witness and his opinion that the inescapable meaning of MvH is that the “doubts” ONLY applied to the citizenship (not possible NBC status) of non-NBC births to aliens and foreigners.
That is a great idea.
However, only the Constitution is required to refute the “just-born here” argument this ignorant buffoon of a “judge” has made.
I had a debate with an ignoramus about a year ago who stated the grandfather clause in Article II was no longer valid. His argument was that since it no longer applied (expired in 1776 based on his assessment), Amendment XIV could be used to define a natural born citizen.
After correcting him on the enactment date of the Constitution, I politely educated him on the term “ratification”. That ended the discussion abruptly.