Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

All That Is Wrong with Georgia State Judge Michael M. Malihi’s Decision...
Natural Born Citizen ^ | February 3, 2012 | Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

Posted on 02/04/2012 7:39:14 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike

Georgia State Administrative Law Judge, Michael M. Malihi, issued his decision on Friday, February 3, 2012, finding that putative President, Barack Obama, is eligible as a candidate for the presidential primary election under O.C.G.A. Sec. 21-2-5(b). The decision can be read here, http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/02/judge-malihi-rules-against-plaintiffs.html . I must enter my objection to this decision which is not supported by either fact or law.

The Court held: “For purposes of this analysis, this Court considered that President Barack Obama was born in the United States. Therefore, as discussed in Arkeny [sic meant Ankeny], he became a citizen at birth and is a natural born citizen.”

(Excerpt) Read more at puzo1.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: birther; moonbatbirther; naturalborncitizen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 last
To: mlo; All

Wait and see. You may be proved wrong quite soon.

You appear to be willing to accept that when it overrides your “arrogantly” (smile) IMPOSED condition that parentage does not matter. Which is correct ONLY after the changes made way after Obama’s birth and ignores those conditions prevaltn at that time as law.

It’s like insisting that a new version of software was in effect when that software version had not been released at a certain past date. And which references (according to your parentage posit but not in reality) what was there and vallid in a past time frame.

Misleading misinformation!
cheers,


121 posted on 02/05/2012 2:37:27 PM PST by FARS (Be Healthy, Happy and Thrive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: FARS
"Wait and see. You may be proved wrong quite soon."

I never get tired of birthers saying that. :-)

"You appear to be willing to accept that when it overrides your “arrogantly” (smile) IMPOSED condition that parentage does not matter. Which is correct ONLY after the changes made way after Obama’s birth and ignores those conditions prevaltn at that time as law."

See, birthers juts can't accept that they are wrong about anything. Nothing changed. Birthers like to believe it did, but that's exactly what the courts have been saying you are wrong about. But of course, any birther knows the law better than any silly old judge. Naturally.

122 posted on 02/05/2012 4:02:24 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: danamco

Yes it was reported and no it was not unprecedented:

Here is the LA times report of that meeting from 15 January:

“WASHINGTON — President-elect Barack Obama paid a visit Wednesday to the Supreme Court and chatted in front of a fireplace with Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., a fellow Harvard law graduate whose confirmation he opposed three years ago.

Twice in recent decades, incoming presidents have paid a pre-inaugural visit to the court. President Reagan and Vice President George H.W. Bush did so in 1981, and President Clinton and Vice President Al Gore in 1992.

No such visit was arranged for President Bush in 2001. Since the Supreme Court had cleared the way for Bush’s victory a few weeks earlier in a 5-4 ruling, a friendly visit was seen as awkward.

Last month Roberts wrote Obama and extended an invitation. Noting the past visits, he said, “The associate justices and I would be pleased to see that sporadic practice become a congenial tradition.”

http://articles.latimes.com/2009/jan/15/nation/na-obama-roberts15


123 posted on 02/06/2012 7:11:59 PM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Joe Marine 76

I say this Psalm almost incessantly!


124 posted on 02/06/2012 11:05:34 PM PST by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196

Really?

And WHAT was reported??

And was that what you claim “reported” not done by his State-Run Dung Head Media???

Did GWB and Cheney go there???


125 posted on 02/07/2012 7:37:42 AM PST by danamco (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196
Hey new comer, it's amazing how gullible people will swallow with hook, sink and line ALL what the LSM feeds you!

No such visit was arranged for President Bush in 2001. Since the Supreme Court had cleared the way for Bush's victory a few weeks earlier in a 5-4 ruling, a friendly visit was seen as awkward.

This quote just make my point, first Alito protested and stayed away likewise he expressed his opinion "speaking" out when scolded at the SOTU address. Second, Clarence Thomas has publicly declared: "We are evading that" as reference to the NBC issue and their ruling in Florida 2000 recount!!

So mister or miss, tell us WHAT else were reported. There still room here for more trolls at their own peril!!!

126 posted on 02/07/2012 7:55:26 AM PST by danamco (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: danamco

Just pointing out that you were wrong about it being unprecedented and not reported.

Do you deny that Reagan made an identical visit?


127 posted on 02/07/2012 9:55:58 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: danamco
He was talking about the presidential eligibility of Congressman David Serrano - it is a long running joke going back years:

”I’m still waiting for the [court decision] on whether or not a Puerto Rican can run for president of the United States,

“Oh really?” asked Serrano. “So you haven’t answered the one about whether I can serve as president, but you answer this one?”

“We’re evading that one,” answered Thomas, “We’re giving you another option.””

128 posted on 02/07/2012 10:08:37 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196

Hey newcomer smart Alec. Just tell us in plain language WHAT was reported at that meeting except for one single photo op withou Alito, who was protesting to be among the cowards!!!


129 posted on 02/07/2012 3:08:58 PM PST by danamco (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: danamco
Why is this such a big deal? Are you saying that Chief Justice Roberts, having decided to conspire with Obama to violate the Constitution, invited the press to publicize the event?

Believe in fantastic conspiracy theories all you want. I am more inclined to believe that birthers simply misunderstand the law.

130 posted on 02/07/2012 3:27:56 PM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196

A new SP?


131 posted on 02/07/2012 7:37:14 PM PST by danamco (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson