[GlockThe Vote]

How on eartch can he rule in favor of a defaulting party who did not appear or even put up a defense or present counter evidence?

This smells awful.

[Ditter]

Because he is scared?

[BuckeyeTexan]

He offered a default judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. They preferred to have him rule on he merits of the case.

[AFret.]

How on eartch can he rule in favor of a defaulting party who did not appear or even put up a defense or present counter evidence?

---

I’m stunned..How in the Hell did this judge favor the plantiff in his ruling..o told the court to pound sand by ignoring a subpoena..and they rule in his favor? I have no words..why vote, why care..no one else does..