Actually, Malihi based his decision on Jablonski’s ‘Motion To Dismiss’. Jablonski cites Ankeny v Daniels in it. Also there is a Jill Pryor connection to all of this.
Yes, I noticed Pryor’s to rewrite history book cited by Malihi in footnote 1.
Does anyone else see how ridiculous it is to decide the laws of one state by what a state court may have ruled in another state? Amateur-like work product is all I can say.