But lets cut to the chase. Chief Justice swore in Obama not once but twice. If this case ever makes it to the Supreme Court, do you honestly think he is going to say “you know, when I swore him in, I was ignorant of the law and of the Constitution and made a huge legal error.”? That is what must happen for all this to end up the way you wish. Do you really think Roberts would have sworn in a man he knew was not eligible? NO. Roberts would not have sworn in a man he knew was not eligible. The Problem is, He did swear in a man who was not eligible, but Roberts didn't know this aspect of the law well enough to realize it.
It takes a great deal of research to look past the constant assertion that being born here makes someone a natural born citizen. Unless people have actually bothered to learn of the origins of Article II, and how the term mentioned therein was understood in that day an era, then they will simply not understand.
Falling down a hill is easy. Climbing up one is not.
He did swear in a man who was not eligible, but Roberts didn't know this aspect of the law well enough to realize it.Oh, brother... Really? God, that's pathetic. I don't even think a facepalm .jpg would be effective in conveying the idiocy of what you just wrote.
I guess I have more faith in Roberts than you do. Lets not also forget Scalia and Thomas - when you reach the point where you contend that three of the top conservative legal minds are ignorant of basic Constitutional principles then perhaps your argument is not as strong as you think.