Now Malihi cites the ludicrous Ankeny case which treats the Minor NBC language as a holding BUT fails the parse the plain words and grammar of the key “citizen” sentences correctly in context and suddenly this makes Barry an NBC!
The Minor-deniers claim that since SCOTUS never reached whether Minor was POTUS eligible, the NBC language was dicta, but when looking at WKA these same Minor-deniers agree with Ankeny and Malihi that even though SCOTUS did not reach NBC status for WKA, the so-called dicta from Minor cited in WKA (construed magically together with the 14A) is now interpreted to be a HOLDING sufficient to make Barry an NBC.
Truth and integrity is not a strong point in our judiciary when dealing with political issues.
Their lack of honesty cuts across the spectrum of political issues that end up in their courts. Take Obamacare court cases for instance. Half of the judge opinions misconstrue the intent and meaning of the Constitutional ‘Commerce Clause’ that the government can mandate citizens to buy health insurance, and be fined or taxed if citizens choose not to buy into government mandated health care.