To: PA-RIVER
This ruling means that the judge is corrupt. He ruled based upon what he was sent, outside of the court preceedings, and that so the plaintiffs could not address the Ankeny ruling and perhaps refute it. The judge was workign for little barry bassturd all along, so the presentments didn’tmean a damned thing with a corrupt judge.
315 posted on
02/03/2012 6:51:03 PM PST by
MHGinTN
(Being deceived can be cured.)
To: MHGinTN
Since it was not a trial, the judge was not restricted to evidence presented at the hearing. He had the obligation to apply existing law. Like it or not, Ankeny is existing case law.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson