Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: PA-RIVER

This ruling means that the judge is corrupt. He ruled based upon what he was sent, outside of the court preceedings, and that so the plaintiffs could not address the Ankeny ruling and perhaps refute it. The judge was workign for little barry bassturd all along, so the presentments didn’tmean a damned thing with a corrupt judge.


315 posted on 02/03/2012 6:51:03 PM PST by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN
Since it was not a trial, the judge was not restricted to evidence presented at the hearing. He had the obligation to apply existing law. Like it or not, Ankeny is existing case law.
349 posted on 02/03/2012 8:23:36 PM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson