Look at footnote 4, page 6. And footnote 6 page 10.
Footnote 4.
"definition of this clause has been the source of much debate. See, e.g.,Gordon, Who Can Be President of the United States: The Unresolved Enigma, 28 Md. L. Rev. 1 (1968); Jill A. Pryor, Note, The Natural-Born Citizen Clause and Presidential Eligibility: An Approach for Resolving Two Hundred Yearsof Uncertainty, 97 Yale L.J. 881 (1988); Christina S. Lohman, Presidential Eligibility: The Meaning of the Natural-Born Citizen Clause, 36 Gonz. L. Rev. 349 (2000); William T. Han, Beyond Presidential Eligibility: The Natural Born Citizen Clause as a Source of Birthright Citizenship, 58 Drake L. Rev. 457 (2010)"
Cites recent publications which is usually a red flag because of liberalism infiltration. Go from 1950s and back are likely to much more credible about NBC.
Looking at one cited book above by Jill Pryor ,as I recall, she is a leftist Dem living in Atlanta.
http://www.jstor.org/pss/796518
Infiltrated liberal thought permeates the country - indeed.
quote
Even though I've never been in the “Judge Malihi is a closet birther or incompetent” camp, I decided to sus out some of the law review citations in footnote 4 of Judge Malihi’s decision, because judges can send subtle signals with their choice of citations.
There's nothing to report in that regard, as the decision cites respectable authority rather than neo-authoritarian claptrap.
But I did discover one “point of interest.” One of the cited articles was a student note written in 1988 by a woman who is now a lawyer in Atlanta, Jill Pryor. On January 5, a flock of news articles reported that Pryor would be the Obama administration's pick for a vacancy on the Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit.
Coincidence? Womp, Womp, Womp!
Chancery
unquote