Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Matchett-PI

—which is why it is absurd to argue for “states rights”—

Actually, no. The context of the phrase “states rights” is the same as the context of “citizen’s rights”. The context is “states ‘rights’ vs the federal government’s power over the states “right” to exercise their own power.


30 posted on 02/02/2012 4:42:56 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: cuban leaf; Diamond; betty boop
—....which is why it is absurd to argue for “states rights....”—

cuban leaf: "Actually, no. The context of the phrase “states rights” is the same as the context of “citizen’s rights”. The context is “states ‘rights’ vs the federal government’s power over the states “right” to exercise their own power."

Actually yes.

Better read it again....THIS TIME more carefully. By "more carefully", I mean that you will have to pay close attention to the two phrases you completely overlooked in your out of context excerpt. To wit:

"....'in order to'..." ---and--- "....as a pretext to'..."

bttt

36 posted on 02/02/2012 6:40:14 AM PST by Matchett-PI ("One party will generally represent the envied, the other the envious. Guess which ones." ~GagdadBob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson