Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Danae

KUDOS Danae! You are so right.

I hear considerable conservative blustering about Obama’s philosophies, which are unAmerican but never really referenced as such. Newt talks about Saul Alinsky, Beck discusses socialism, and Rush and Hannity slather it on with similar oblique references.

But none of them are willing to address the root issue - WHY Obama was not raised to appreciate American culture, but rather to rebel and fight against it. It is exactly this kind of foreign influence which the Framers intended to preclude from the US Presidency by requiring “natural born Citizen” status.

But the national media, even the conservative wing of that industry, finds the subject taboo, even to the point of ignoring the fact that, as of 01/26/2012, a state court in Georgia has finally accepted testimony and evidence in a legitimate complaint that Barack Obama is Constitutionally ineligible to serve as POTUS.

This event should have opened up a full discussion of the issue in the media, but instead we find a virtual syndicated news blackout. Even Drudge only carried a small blurb about it for a couple of hours, then - poof! - gone. Someone mentioned Obama’s Indonesian upbringing on Hannity recently and he shut it down to avoid “...getting me in trouble.”

My belief is that a treacherous deal was struck when then-Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton signed off on Senate Resolution 511, a non-binding agreement accepting John McCain as a natural born citizen, even though he was not born on US soil, because his parents (plural) were US citizens upon his birth. From that moment on, I believe the topic of Obama’s illegitimacy was off limits.

What’s the down side of breeching that contract at this point? It must be formidable to keep this issue in check for so long.

What’s the downside of keeping the agreement? It seems to me that Republicans and Democrats have conspired in this matter to the ruination of the Constitution, no less.

What could be worse than both major parties in cooperation against the US Constitution? This presents awesome challenges and responsibility incumbent on we citizens to overthrow this concerted attack on the Supreme Law of our land.

I wonder: Are we up to it?


122 posted on 01/30/2012 11:26:28 AM PST by TexasVoter (No Constitution? No Union!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TexasVoter

“What could be worse than both major parties in cooperation against the US Constitution? This presents awesome challenges and responsibility incumbent on we citizens to overthrow this concerted attack on the Supreme Law of our land.”

I wonder the same thing often. I believe that both parties are now deliberately covering this up. The GOP knew about it before Obama was elected but could not do diddly about it because McCain had the same problem. So they screwed us. They are still screwing us, only now we do not have the constitution to protect us. The only hope I see is a massive number of citizens DEMANDING redress for this wrong, and I don’t see that happening either. Not enough people know or seem to care. Or they have bought into the Alynski BS and the mockery of the Birth Certificate - which was irrelevant from the get go.

We can’t give up though. I pray that Georgia is the crack in this seal of doom.


123 posted on 01/30/2012 12:03:52 PM PST by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson