Ping,
Thought this old racist magazine from the 1930s was dead decade ago but it is still around and guess who is praising it.
Ron Paul is a highly seductive nut.
“...ought to settle the matter among people of open minds.”
That sure doesn’t include out the average Paul cultist.
What will Ron Paul think of next? Perhaps a specific defense of the blood libel on his Congressional letterhead?
“Ron Paul Praised Anti-Semitic Magazine On Congressional Letterhead”
Could you show us where in fact Paul has praised American Mercury? The letter (http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/Aug79Let.PDF) shows that Paul thanked Amos W. Bruce for sending a copy of an article, which Paul says he found interesting.
Another lie perhaps? If Paul is so bad, why do people have to lie about his positions?
It should be footnoted that the “American Mercury” was not anti Semetic or racist from its beginnings in the 20’s until it was bought out in 1952. Thereafter, it was despicable.
once again, here it is, this time on his own letterhead
you are supporting a racist anti-semite for president
you have been given the proof right here in his own letterhead document
his own
I never heard of the Robert A. Taft Club, but I'm well-versed enough in American history to know that to the best of my knowledge, Robert Taft himself had never been associated with any racism or antisemitism, despite the fact that the chronology of his career in the US Senate overlapped the time frame of Nazi Germany and WWII, when such bigotry was more common and acceptable even in the US.
So if some white supremacists are indeed connected to the Robert A. Taft Club, they are tarnishing the man's legacy.
Anti-semitic or anti-semiOtic?