Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: JewishRighter
I hope you are correct, and he includes presented evidence in his ruling, but I doubt it. Carl Swensson, one of the plaintiffs is reporting this over at ORYR.
The Judge pulled the lawyers for the three cases into chambers before it all began and advised them that he would be issuing a default judgment in our favor, since the Defense council failed to show, and wanted to end it there.
Appearently, the judge only begrudgingly listened to any evidence.
37 posted on 01/26/2012 12:55:29 PM PST by MMaschin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: MMaschin

I see your point, but I ask you this: if the judge was determined to enter a default judgment that just says “Obama shall not be on the ballot”, why did he allow the plaintiffs to proceed with proofs of Obama’s eligibility? If it will have no effect on the resulting judgment, why would he waste the time? He just seemed like a really no-nonsense guy and not likely to just indulge the plaintiffs only to throw the transcript and the exhibits in the trash. We shall see, we shall see...Let us pray that there is some hope for those of us who have been agonizing over this travesty of a president.


39 posted on 01/26/2012 1:39:56 PM PST by JewishRighter (Anybody but Hussein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: MMaschin

All the judge had to do was read Obozo’s web site from ‘08 on which 0 stated that he was the son of a British subject-—and thus NOT a NBC.

This judge sounds like a hardline conservative, in which case may God bless him...or some sort of Democrat trickster with something up his sleeve.


41 posted on 01/26/2012 1:51:12 PM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson