Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: WPaCon

I object to the notion that the greatest threat humanity faces is lack of fecundity.

Humans have problems - but fecundity is not one of them.

Looking at the graph of human population over the last few thousand years it seems obvious that we are headed up for 8 billion a lot faster than we are headed down to 6 billion.

I also don’t think overpopulation is that big of a problem - IF you have a corresponding change in technology that makes us all live in health and comfort. I think the Earth could easily support 14 billion people - but not with present day technology.

People see a trend and then say “What if...... what if the trend continued unabated for the next forty years?”

The recent decrease in birth rates from historic highs will most likely be a dip at best that will slow but never decrease our rapid climb to 8 billion people.

The sky is not falling. In forty years the sky will almost certainly not fall. When children are needed women can produce them at a rate of 7 per woman.

One thing I think we can all count on is human beings fornicating and producing children when they want them.

In forty years if more children are needed I am sure there will be volunteers to make them.

Until then we are at 7 billion and rapidly approaching 8.


165 posted on 01/24/2012 4:10:29 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream

166 posted on 01/24/2012 4:17:03 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson