Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: parksstp

I think Mitt’s big problem is, before SC everyone thought he was the best to beat Obama, the safest. I think soon as they saw Newt in the debates they realized NEWT had a better chance to beat Obama because he can articulate conservatism and that Romney has as much baggage as Newt if you really look. They all do.


15 posted on 01/20/2012 3:05:08 PM PST by ez (When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: ez
I think soon as they saw Newt in the debates they realized NEWT had a better chance to beat Obama because he can articulate conservatism...

I agree, and I predict a 6-8% win for Gingrich, notwithstanding the vastly over-rated evangelical endorsement of Santorum. Evangelicals are not robots who vote based solely on what they hear from the pulpit. They are real, ordinary people like all of us, with minds of their own. And those who are motivated to vote are fired up by Gingrich's bulldog debate performances.

Also, Newt is from neighboring Georgia, while Mitt is a Yankee lib, and Santorum is from someplace called Indiana. That will count in the voting.

19 posted on 01/20/2012 3:18:00 PM PST by ARepublicanForAllReasons (Crony Capitalism & Union boot-licking Marxist politicians are our undoing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson