No, I’m NOT voting for a crackpot who thinks 9/11 is America’s fault. No, I’m NOT voting for a Jew hater who wishes Israel never existed. No, there’s no way I’m voting for someone who teams up with Code Pinko and George $oros.
What’s so difficult to understand ?
Why don’t you answer my questions instead of just repeating the same assertions without any evidence, proof, or argument?
What’s so difficult to understand is why you think ad hominem arguments and loaded terms constitute argument? We can discuss all these allegations, but not until we agree on a standard to judge by and an assurance that arguments will be taken seriously. Otherwise we are just wasting time.
It’s fun to spar with you over these issues, but at some point we have to stop sparring and get down to good, hard, arguments. I’m ready whenever you are, but not until we come to some agreement about the terms of the debate.