"It must be understood that the period can be a few weeks, maybe a few months, but for sure not years. "The deadline for this is mid-January, and, as far as I know, an extension is unlikely."
LOL. See underlined section above. A quote from November says ZIP about the situation at current time. And it doesn't sound like Mr. Braga is the one who makes the final determination. This is your typical projection of your personal prejudices onto uncertain statements to "promote" them into "case proven against Rossi". The simple fact is that neither you or I know what the situation as regards the contract is today.
SANE people (and certainly anyone trained in science) divide information into five categories:
Proven true....has hard data absolutely proving the case.
Probably True....has hard data indicating, but not sufficient to prove the case.
Insufficient Information....some data exists for both true and not true.
Probably Not True.....the majority of data indicates "not true".
Proven False....hard data exists proving the "not true" state.
Your modus operandi in the case of Rossi seems to be:
Proven true......assumed to be false
Probably true.....assumed to be false.
Insufficient data.....assumed to be false.
Probably Not True.....proven false.
Proven False.......proven false.
Do you begin to see why I think you're nuts??
Why not email Mssr. Braga and ask him what the status of the contract TODAY is.
LOL. See underlined section above. A quote from November says ZIP about the situation at current timeYou're an idiot.
The quote from November is all the information that is publicly available. You insist on making up totally unsubstantiated guesses about possible changes, even though you are the one without a shred of evidence to support it.
By the way, have you been following the postings on Vortex today? Looks like the mountain of lies by Rossi are starting to crumble.