Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/06/2012 5:03:35 AM PST by Reaganite Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ken5050

*PING*


2 posted on 01/06/2012 5:04:51 AM PST by Reaganite Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican

As much as I hate to say it, it is looking like conservatives should start backing Newt as their candidate of unfortunate choice, if they really want Obama gone.


3 posted on 01/06/2012 5:08:49 AM PST by ZX12R (FUBO GTFO 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All


Help End The Obama Era In 2012
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


4 posted on 01/06/2012 5:12:15 AM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican

If you are taking flak, you must be over the target... you can tell who libs fear most by watching the ferocity of attacks... they fear newt


5 posted on 01/06/2012 5:12:21 AM PST by joe fonebone (Project Gunwalker, this will make watergate look like the warm up band......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican

Newt is going to frigging clean up.

Enjoy NH, Romney. We will gift you one win.


10 posted on 01/06/2012 5:33:08 AM PST by VanDeKoik (1 million in stimulus dollars paid for this tagline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican

sfl


16 posted on 01/06/2012 6:18:19 AM PST by phockthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican

I have always liked Newt. I thought he was unelectable, but now I’m not so sure. If he gains the nomination, we will find out what this country is made of because I have no doubt he will not cave like McCain did and act like running for president was just another civics lesson. No perfect candidate exists and I have been going back and forth over these few months, so I’m going with the smartest and most tenacious. That is not to say I wouldn’t support Perry or Santorum, I would in a heartbeat in a one-on-one with The One.


17 posted on 01/06/2012 6:19:41 AM PST by mancini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican
Only Newt Gingrich has the encyclopedic recall of historical/political facts that can put serial-prevaricator Obama -a man who's whole gig is based on b&%#$ing you- back on his heels for all to see.

I can agree with this but there has to be more to choosing a president than debating skills. Record has to account for something.

18 posted on 01/06/2012 6:26:50 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican

"Vote Count Error? Did Rick Santorum Really Win the Iowa Caucuses?
DES MOINES, Iowa - Edward True, 28, of Moulton, said he helped count the votes
and jotted the results down on a piece of paper to post to his Facebook page.
He said when he checked to make sure the Republican Party of Iowa
got the count right, he said he was shocked to find they hadn’t.
“When Mitt Romney won Iowa by eight votes and I’ve got a
20-vote discrepancy here, that right there says Rick Santorum won Iowa,” True said. “Not Mitt Romney.”


"Several UNREPORTED news reports have it that Romney
did not win the Iowa Caucuses.
Barring any objective, verifiable proof that shows more than 12 votes mistakenly
being credited to Santorum, Romney lost."


"Could Typo Rewrite Caucus History? (Santorum may regain win)"



22 posted on 01/06/2012 8:02:19 AM PST by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican; musicman; TitansAFC; katiedidit1; PhilDragoo; TexasFreeper2009

You’re doing an awesome job. Thank you very much. I hope we can add worthy links to your work, like musicman has.


24 posted on 01/06/2012 9:58:11 AM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC:DONATE MONTHLY! Sarah's New Ping List - tell me if you want on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican
Implies conclusions not in evidence. "Yes, there's a reason Santorum was almost-completely ignored for all of 2011, and voters in November's general would surely be just as underwhelmed as have been most Republicans- right up until last week, anyway." Yes, and the reason is he hasn't had any money. Now he does. The presidency is for those who have the 2000 lb gonads to step up and take it. I've liked the idea of Rick Santorum for a very long time. He is the anti-dO-te.
25 posted on 01/06/2012 9:59:09 AM PST by ichabod1 (Mr. Santorum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican

Very interesting, and very savvy of you to be on top of this:
It looks like the MSM/fake-poll-spun Romney may wind up being
Gingrich’s warm-up act, as Romney ideally (to me) may serve as a stand-in for the final opponent, Obama.
Gingrich, primarily, but all others collectively may help in delivering slow-mo knockout punches over the coming months
to the “inevitable” Romney
nomination.
Regardless of what an “acceptably” good game Romney talks
in his quest for Independents and disaffected former Obama
supporters, his message simply is not going to reach millions of important voters who see themselves as making
a life-or-death decision in the primaries this year and November. Romney simply WON’T present himself as a viable alternative to Obama—he doesn’t have the fire in the belly, NOR the rhetorical/factual wherewithal to do so.
On the other hand, Gingrich is so “policy-ready” on the debate floor, that every little tidbit he puts out is grabbed and spun by the MSM to put it in the most negative light as quickly as possible (black schoolkids apprenticing as janitors, etc. etc.)
The fact is, Gingrich’s arguments and positions on just about everything BEGIN at a point most of his opponent’s
arguments NEVER GET TO: that constitutes a practical weakness he will have to straighten out right quick—how to
avoid having every little proposal you make demagogued by
the MSM, the Obama Surrogates, and ALSO your “fellow Republicans”.
NO ONE will win the nomination without Tea party support,
and now that Cain and Bachmann are gone, that leaves fewer and fewer candidates to draw that constituency to them.
Without knowing about these polls, I was forecasting the same results to someone I was having a “discussion” with last night at our annual New Year’s Chamber of Commerce meeting in Bergen COunty , New Jersey.
We all stand behind any candidate other than Romney to do as well as he can: for me, this means Gingrich.


27 posted on 01/06/2012 10:19:42 AM PST by supremedoctrine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican
IMHO it would serve conservatives well to realize they're being manipulated by the Left, MSM, and Romney-ite RINO wing of the party...

That's not a wing of the party, it's the party establishment.

29 posted on 01/06/2012 10:22:59 AM PST by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican

Excellent post..great job on research and most of all YOU made my day!!!!!!!!!!! The SC majority leader endorsed Newt. Romney is in SC now trying to buy votes. I do think the southerners are a lot more savvy as to the political tricks and scams by both Romney and the RNP..oh and toss in Fox News.
Wish I could plaster your post all over SC, VA, Georgia and NH!!!!


30 posted on 01/06/2012 10:28:36 AM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican
Finally, somebody who can see reality.

Santorum is a good man, but will never win a national election.

33 posted on 01/06/2012 11:32:07 AM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican

I like your thesis, but I’m confused about the poll numbers. The ones that I could find through the links for each state listed are mostly a few weeks old going back as far as the beginning of December. Do we have polling data that show that Newt is still maintaining that kind of strength in the last few days?


35 posted on 01/06/2012 12:37:38 PM PST by JewishRighter (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican

“flakiest GOP primary electorate in history”

Why oh why is anyone that follows politics making a claim like this?

Name me one presidential election cycle in the last TWENTY YEARS (That is after the Reagan years for those in Rio Linda) that didn’t fit this description???????

We are always left with the option of voting while holding our noses.


43 posted on 01/06/2012 5:36:43 PM PST by thatjoeguy (MAYDAY! MAYDAY! We are so going in ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican

Santorum has overtaken Gingrich in the only recent pair of South Carolina polls, released yesterday 1/5/12. See above.


44 posted on 01/06/2012 5:42:11 PM PST by StAnDeliver (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganite Republican

bump


48 posted on 01/07/2012 10:06:18 AM PST by Tribune7 (Vote Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson