Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TSA abuse has been going on for years – here’s my story
TSA News ^ | December 29, 2011 | Wendy Thomson

Posted on 01/03/2012 5:17:42 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Thanks for posting.

I refuse to fly due to prostheses. My own family doesn’t even ‘get’ this. They think (none of them have a prosthetic of any kind) since they’ve never been treated as described in Wendy’s story that no one does; it’s all fantasy. They make fun of my refusal to fly. I’m so hoping that one of them gets the full treatment soon!


21 posted on 01/03/2012 6:31:09 AM PST by whatshotandwhatsnot (Islam wants you dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tigerized
From what I witnessed, the purpose of the TSA was never ti catch terrorists, but, to intimidate and terrorize the sheep.

I remember when it first begin. When a t.v. reporter would stick a camera in the face of some idiot and said idiot would say, "I don't mind is as long as it will make me secure."

22 posted on 01/03/2012 6:32:32 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: econjack
All TSA does is raise the cost of flying

That's the case with most government regulation. I read somewhere that over half the cost of building anything is the cost of regulation and of acquiring the permits needed to be "leagal." My 82 year old father was doing some light carpentry and painting on a friend's two family a couple years ago when the assistant building inspector stormed in and ordered him to stop work because he didn't have a "construction supervisor license." He said that he wasn't supervising anyone and wasn't doing any construction -- just painting and trim -- so he didn't need one. The BI threatened to call in the cops to have him removed so he left.

The BI was wrong about needing a license to do finish work but he stopped work just so he could flex his bureaucratic muscles.

23 posted on 01/03/2012 6:34:50 AM PST by Cowman (How can the IRS seize property without a warrant if the 4th amendment still stands?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FrogMom

Oh, they’re going to be dealing with drivers also. They’ve recently asked for a budget increase so they can put more of their “VIPR” teams on the road. Their spokesman was quoted as saying the “Transportation” in their name doesn’t limit them to airports. Soon you will also be groped before boarding any public transportation, and possible at a TSA roadblock. We’re all frogs, can you feel the water getting warm yet?


24 posted on 01/03/2012 6:36:20 AM PST by cbvanb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: theBuckwheat

I was recently “ordered” by a TSA agent to go through the X-ray device because I had a plastic comb and the paper bording pass in my shirt pocket. You would have thought I was attempting to rob a bank. Apparently this very expensive organization, reportedly with 6000 bureaucrats on DC, can’t even get their procedures consistent at different airports.
When did having to remove plastic and paper from your pockets start?


25 posted on 01/03/2012 6:39:27 AM PST by bytesmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

My wife has breathing problems. We just took a trip where she had to bring a portable oxygen machine on the plane. Her mother found this TSA hotline we called and they went out of their way to accommodate us. We had a personal agent escort us through check in and security. A wheelchair for my wife. Couldn’t have been more pleased with their help. I’m sure our tax dollars were paying for it but for a handicapped person like my wife it was well worth it.


26 posted on 01/03/2012 6:40:55 AM PST by McGruff (Hold the House, retake the Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whatshotandwhatsnot
My own family doesn’t even ‘get’ this.

Talk about adding insult to injury. If your own family isn't supportive and even makes fun of your refusal to fly there's a problem.

27 posted on 01/03/2012 6:41:13 AM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Any lawyers out there that know who has jurisdiction if the fed court doesn’t.

Does it have to be the fed court in DC, as opposed to the other districts?


28 posted on 01/03/2012 6:45:08 AM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Me neither. Basically, if my destination is in CONUS, I drive. The only way I'd fly now would be for a work assignment that was on too short of a timeline to allow me to drive.

However, I can get to several of my typical business trip destinations in a single day of driving. Given that we allow a day on either end of a trip for air travel anyway...it is pretty much a wash. In fact, I just recently let a family member use the last of the air miles I had accumulated. Thinking about switching my credit card from accumulating points to something else. So long airlines and TSA.

29 posted on 01/03/2012 6:47:20 AM PST by ThunderSleeps (Stop obama now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I have a client whose office is at an airport. The first time I visited their directions to their office were to go through the hole in the fence.

Inside their office were about 30 of those simple box cutters. To get from there to the airplane was a simple badge swipe by our single escort. No searches of our bags or anything.

We were under the terminal, 15 feet from several planes loading passengers. Went to the airport datacenter and then the passenger terminal all without any search whatsoever.

The people who work in the passenger terminal have to be screened. The people who work elsewhere do not get screened.


30 posted on 01/03/2012 6:57:44 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bytesmith

It started when the new scanners came in, which pick up those items. This is consistent policy, but you were just not aware of that because you didn’t read the signs.


31 posted on 01/03/2012 7:02:05 AM PST by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The reason TSA concentrates on areas besides the prosthesis itself is because a terrorist could be using the prosthesis to distract the screener from screening for the true location of explosive materials.


32 posted on 01/03/2012 7:06:13 AM PST by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

ROFL


33 posted on 01/03/2012 7:07:49 AM PST by FrogMom (There is no such thing as an honest democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Did you report that?


34 posted on 01/03/2012 7:08:02 AM PST by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Here is the problem. We are fighting terrorists on 3, possibly 4 fronts.

Rag head mudslimes are the obvious terrorists. Government terrorists TSA, ATF, DHS..., and the enemy within aka progressives who have to hide their communist/Marxist colors behind the progressive term. The 4th might be the media.

Unfortunately, we are not allowed to engage any of these enemies with any amount of force so we are fighting a war without weapons and without any chance of winning.

Because we allowed our government to step outside of its constitutional restraints there is absolutely nothing we can do to reign them back in. The progressives, long ago took complete control of the dumbocrap party and are well on their way in controlling the GOP. With essentially a single Government Party with a left and right wing even our votes no longer have enough force to return the country to the path the founders so brilliantly placed us on.

The US Supreme Court long ago became nothing more that a dumping place for political hacks that the president at the time figured would do his bidding. If you doubt this then try to explain how 9 alleged brilliant justices cannot agree better than 5-4 on most cases when the document they MUST use as a reference is actually very short (not 2000+ pages) and even comes with an operators manual known as the Federalist Papers.


35 posted on 01/03/2012 7:12:53 AM PST by Wurlitzer (Welcome to the new USSA (United Socialist States of Amerika))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The TSA (Thoroughly Stupid Agency)is NOT in the business of searching for terrorists. They are in the business of treating everyone as a terrorist. So, if you want to be treated like a terrorist Fly, if not drive. I will not fly until this stupid agency is disbanded.


36 posted on 01/03/2012 7:16:19 AM PST by JayAr36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sport
"I don't mind is as long as it will make me secure."

And that's the deal, isn't it? This is classic conditioning. Remember boys & girls - the president can arrest and hold people indefinitely if their name appears on the right piece of paper. It's here and it is today.

Complaining will not rectify any TSA overreaching (no pun intended). Things should have never been allowed to get like this, but they have. Things will not improve until enough people stop flying or when a large percentage of flyers no longer allow themselves to be treated this way.
37 posted on 01/03/2012 7:23:27 AM PST by AD from SpringBay (We deserve the government we allow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Kirkwood

Report what and to whom? I assume since we passed by TSA agents and Sheriffs deputies during the process that they were aware of the process.

Airport security is a joke, meant to provide the illusion of security and keep people buying tickets.


38 posted on 01/03/2012 7:29:09 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
got ‘favors’ from a beautiful stewardess

Laz is nibblin' at the edges of breaking his New Year resolution.....

39 posted on 01/03/2012 7:30:59 AM PST by ErnBatavia (Obama Voters: Jose Baez wants YOU for his next jury pool.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia
Nope. I simply will not post it.

I might do it.

But I won't post it.

40 posted on 01/03/2012 7:41:30 AM PST by Lazamataz (Romney is the Pale Obama. That's all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson