Who would conservatives have more of a chance to influence
on matters of policy?
O has a vision. a known quantity who will act predictably.
We can stop him in Congress. Our military is giving him good advice. We may survive O2. But Mitt is a project manager, not a visionary. He’ll want to appease Dems to enable everyone to get along. Of course the Dems want what he did in Mass done on a national basis. If they get Mitt to get it done for them, its as if they won, isn’t it?
We can beat O on what we know he will do. Stymie him in Congress.. But if Mitt has a GOP controlled House he can have the same power to encroach the 2A and introduce state sponsored compulsary health care systems as in Mass.
Who would conservatives have more of a chance to influence on matters of policy? O has a vision. a known quantity who will act predictably. We can stop him in Congress. Our military is giving him good advice. We may survive O2. But Mitt is a project manager, not a visionary. He’ll want to appease Dems to enable everyone to get along. Of course the Dems want what he did in Mass done on a national basis. If they get Mitt to get it done for them, its as if they won, isn’t it? We can beat O on what we know he will do. Stymie him in Congress.. But if Mitt has a GOP controlled House he can have the same power to encroach the 2A and introduce state sponsored compulsary health care systems as in Mass.