[wagglebee]

One of the things that bothers me, and frankly has kept me from joining here is the way new posters are treated. It is like a clique in High School all over again.

Well, we all had to deal with it once upon a time.

Already my join date is referenced as if that somehow invalidates anything I say.

Because you referred to events that took place four and a half years before you joined.

Can someone simply read FR for its great news content jump in and have a conversation with like minded people ?

Sure, but I NEVER considered the Rooty Rooters to be "like minded" people.

I am just banging my head on Gingrich, I just don’t get the support for him, I would rather lose supporting a Santorum than win supporting someone like Gingrich.

I don't no of anyone "supporting" Newt's divorces, but remember that Reagan was also a divorcee and that worked out just fine.

[lakewood conservative]

I believe President Reagan did not leave his wife (2 times) for another woman (2 times). Frankly I am uncomfortable having Gingrich and Reagan in the same conversation, unsavory to my mind.

I have a suspicion there is more to these divorces and it will probably -or should- make a real conservative very sad they went all in on this guy.

i only referred to Giuliani because I watched with amusement people getting all twisted here over that issue, hardly a post went by with either Giuliani dressed like a woman or post about him cheating on his wife.

I hope that this all gets sorted out soon as this site looks to be getting pretty nasty over who is supporting who. I am not a Romney supporter (I would probably vote for Santorum) but I am very underwhelmed by this whole process.

[Politicalmom]

It is disgusting and intellectually dishonest to compare Reagan, who was divorced against his will, to a serial adulterer.