[editor-surveyor]

The accident imaginators have yet to present any kind of plausible way for sexual reproduction to arise out of a-sexual kritters.

(that of course hasn’t stopped them from stroking their psuedo-intellectual organs with glee)

[wintertime]

(that of course hasn’t stopped them from stroking their psuedo-intellectual organs with glee)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Pushing evolution on captive children and force taxpayers to pay for has NON-neutral political, social, and non-neutral religious consequences for our nation, especially in the voting booth.

[drtom]

Not so.

There are enough "kritters", as you call them, that exist in both sexual and asexual reproductive forms and thus can easily represent transitional stages. This occurs in many taxonomies, from the simplest single cells (look up "conjugation") to relatively complex lifeforms (look up "caenorhabditis").

In an evolutionary context, sexual reproduction will generally win out despite the need for a mate. This can be proven by means of statistics, or through experiments.