No, the way I explained it was perfectly sufficient. You just can’t accept it because the only way to argue, for you, is to try first and place both sides on an equal footing. But they are not equal. One side has a whole belief system, complete with characters, stories, rules, laws, proverbs, prophecies, a history, a projected future, a homeland, everything. The other side just says “I don’t believe that.”
You seem to have made a perfectly fine belief system for yourself, explaining it away by the use of prefixes, and you just can't accept that's all you've done.
You really should be able to do better if you're going to appoint yourself as the spokesperson of all logic.