[DiogenesLamp]

Look, the words are the same ~ doesn’t take an activist judge to understand what “born” means.

Regarding Liberal judge's interpretation of the 14th amendment, the dispute is not regarding the word "born" it is regarding the words "subject to the jurisdiction thereof".

Liberal Judges think it has no meaning whatsoever, and normal sane people know that it does.

Again, George Will and Ann Coulter explain the issue quite well.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/26/AR2010032603077.html

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=38409

[muawiyah]

Earlier they simply disqualified anchor babies and didn't worry about jurisdiction. The 14th amendment adds in this business about 'subject to the jurisdiction' language.

Inasmuch as someone in the country without permission is obviously "outta' control" it's fair to presume they are in charge of their own children.

We could probably deport well over 40 million people by invoking that standard hard and fast.

You don't really think the Democrats will allow that without a fight do you?

[muawiyah]

BTW, George and Anne are now in the doghouse when it comes to examining American entrails and history.