Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/26/2011 8:30:14 PM PST by EricTheRed_VocalMinority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: EricTheRed_VocalMinority
Look we whites can't continue this ruse.

We get everything we want and we fix it so no one else can do that. We know that that is what voter ID is about.

The whites' really big secret. I exposed it on another thread, the special 800 number that only we have to ask for and get anything we want and to deny others; before the telephone it was a special telegraph, drum, or smoke signal.

Every year I call the educational testing organizations and instruct them to double white scores and reduce black scores by thirty percent.

In 2000 I told Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris that I don't want any black votes to count -- and get rid of that make up! You'll look a lot better without it!

There I feel much better now.

2 posted on 12/26/2011 8:40:47 PM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EricTheRed_VocalMinority

Let us talk reality for a moment..

The paperwork required to get food stamps, one of the most basic ‘poor’ assistance in the United States, requires birth certificates for the recipients, valid government issued photo id, finger printing, and a social security card. If married, you need to have a copy of your marriage certificate as well.

If this ‘photo voter id’ law disenfranchises poor people, then how many millions don’t qualify for food stamps or other basic government assistance?

It is all smoke and mirrors, as requiring valid government issued photo ID prevents voting by the dead, proxy voting for the disabled, and of course the most infamous method, random picking of names from the list out in front of the polling place. At least here in California, there’s a handy list of names, updated frequently throughout the day, as to whom has voted. Go on up, pick a name, and memorize the address, and you too can vote as many times as you wish.


5 posted on 12/26/2011 8:59:07 PM PST by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EricTheRed_VocalMinority
According to them, demanding an official picture I.D. to vote "disenfranchises" poor people...hard to understand how that would be unless those making the argument think poor people are too stupid, lazy and/or irresponsible to get photo ID's in preparation for going to vote - hmmmmm......
7 posted on 12/26/2011 9:11:54 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EricTheRed_VocalMinority

¡


8 posted on 12/26/2011 9:41:29 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (I can take tomorrow, $pend it all today. Who can take your income, tax it all away. Obama Man can. :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EricTheRed_VocalMinority

Voter I.D. is just plain common sense.However democrats can’t use dead people names for a vote nor can one vote often if the law was passed.
Dems love third world rulings.


9 posted on 12/27/2011 3:59:34 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EricTheRed_VocalMinority

I would not continue to equate driving and voting. Rights are not privileges. I, too, become concerned at restrictions on rights. OTOH what we currently allow (fraud) the gummint is taking MY right to vote away by putting a process in place that is NOT actually voting (if my vote Is stolen through fraud). The Rats don’t seem to have a problem stealing MY vote.


10 posted on 12/27/2011 4:28:25 AM PST by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EricTheRed_VocalMinority; Eleutheria5; Impy; InterceptPoint; randita; Politics4US; ...
Great piece, Eric. "Meet the F. O. C.ers" is a very clever title.

Make no mistake: Democrat opposition to voter ID is all because it makes voter fraud significantly more difficult to get away with.

That hits the nail on the head! We have stated exactly that on FR several times.

Democrats NEED fraudulent votes to win elections.

Just a quibble with this point. In some (close) elections, true. In others, they can win without fraud, but fraud can't hurt them and will garner a larger victory. So they calculate that since their chances of getting caught are minuscule, they'll cheat because they can.

...the vast majority of election fraud convictions of recent years has been committed by Democrats.

Not only recent years, but for over a century. One reason is that urban areas are more conducive than more sparsely populated areas to perpetrating fraud (since people are generally more likely to be unfamiliar with one another) and Democrats tend to predominate in urban areas. Furthermore, election fraud convictions represent only a tiny minority of election fraud schemes that actually do occur.

12 posted on 12/31/2011 12:50:12 PM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson