I had to chuckle at pokie and his “completely irrefutable” facts. What Napolitano offers is nothing but subjective opinion. Naturally he is welcome to it but it shows a disturbing lack of critical thinking on his part. I’ve seen better constructed arguments offered up right here at FreeRepublic.
Napolitano is a smart guy and I expected better from him than a lame “Linkum tricked us!” argument.
What Napolitano punkrr/brojoke/the covern offers is nothing but subjective opinion.
Fixed it.
shows a disturbing lack of critical thinking on his part.
Bwahahahahahahahaha!!! What would you/brojoke/the coven know about critical thinking?!?! You neo-yank False Cause Losers deal exclusively in lies, myths and politically correct revisionism whereas the Judge challenged your politically correct historical revisionism with facts and threw it right in your pasty faces. Stings, doesn't it.
Napolitano is a smart guy and I expected better from him than a lame “Linkum tricked us!” argument.
Feel free to provide a fully sourced, credibly referenced rebuttal. Hell, I'll even send the Judge an email and invite him to debate you right here on FR.