Posted on 12/13/2011 2:31:43 AM PST by careyb
Edited on 12/13/2011 9:57:58 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
How so? If the point is both were involved in opening a business, then both did indeed assume the same risk. Choosing a single relatively low risk client from Newt's roster does not mean Mitt was more or less circumspect.
Margin of error
There’s no margin of error in 12/2011 polls?!
LOL!
I assume you are joking.
There is generally a plus or minus of 3.5% on polls.
I know.
In today’s Gallup/USA Today poll, Newt trails Obama, 44% to 50%, (+-4), FWIW. I find polls rather meaningless, at this point.
It’s early ... and anything can happen; ie. Edwards and Hillary 2008.
Krauthammer
Just another ruling class, elitist wannabe.
Yes. Anything can happen. It is really early.
“Bachmann was at 13% in recent IA poll few days ago.”
She claims it as her other home state lol.
Nationally, Bachmann and Santorum don’t have 6 percent between them.
“Barack Obama 43% John McCain 45%
That is within the margin of error.
“Barack Obama 43% John McCain 45%
That is within the margin of error.
What is amazing is that Krauthammer is a bonafide calculating Establishment RINO who is manipulating conservatives....he’s smart enough to do tht....
...and likely laughing that his readers are not smart enough to see it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.