Then Taitz has the Hawaiian DoH over the barrel, although, I look for Hawaii to still be dishonestly evasive.
From "§338-18 Disclosure of records.
...(b)...The following persons shall be considered to have a direct and tangible interest in a public health statistics record:...
"(9) A person whose right to inspect or obtain a certified copy of the record is established by an order of a court of competent jurisdiction;"
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrs2006/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0018.HTM
-end snip-
The HI DOH has quite a history of NOT following its own laws and rules. There would be no surprise if they fight this subpoena like the last subpoenas that Taitz had served on them. People need to understand that their own law would allow them to comply with the subpoena. There’s not a compelling reason to fight a subpoena. By definition, whoever would issue such a subpoena fits the direct and tangible interest requirement. Maybe that needs to be included ON the subpoena itself.
Careful RS, you are gonna to tie up El Sordo’s panties in a wad...