I have not heard of any verifiable evidence that Sinclair has provided and, frankly, he is not the most credible character. I wasn't there - I have no idea whether his allegations are true or not; but there is a lack of evidence, so far as I know. In this case the media is probably doing us a favor, as I think he would be written off as a whack-job and associated with the right.
But, of course, there is a double standard. When Politico reported on Sinclair in June 2008 it said: "Politico isn't reprinting Sinclair's allegations because they are unsubstantiated."
That same standard didn't apply to having 90+ stories about Cain. Typical liberal hypocrisy.
But, of course, there is a double standard. When Politico reported on Sinclair in June 2008 it said: “Politico isn’t reprinting Sinclair’s allegations because they are unsubstantiated.”
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Are you referring to the same Politico that made unsubstantiated reports about Herman Cain?
http://news.yahoo.com/cain-campaign-accuses-politico-unsubstantiated-personal-attacks-014603520.html
I also have no idea whether his allegations are true or not but Sinclair presents far more evidence than the first two women who accused Cain. Politico published their hit piece against Cain with far less proof. Did you take the time to listen to DuJan’s interview with Sinclair? Did you read Wayne Madsen’s report in 2010? All this information should have sparked widespread journalistic investigation, don’t you think?
http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/articles/20100522
I’m a 65 year old grandma and I’m putting myself in some peril just by posting this. Isn’t there just one Murrow journalist with the integrity to seek the truth, to research the facts to either publicly debunk or substantiate DuJan and Sinclair and Madsen?