There are plenty of reasons to doubt Rossi. But there are far fewer reasons to doubt Levi, Kullander, Stremmenos, etc.Even Focardi admits that he doesn't know how Rossi's E-Cats are made or how they work. None of the other scientists you mentioned (nor anyone else) has a clue about what's going on inside and E-Cat. Kullander stated on November 25th that Rossi's E-Cat needs more independent tests to be proven real.
I've read and seen several instances where one of the scientists you've mentioned above has taken a totally unsubstantiated claim from Rossi and treated it as though it were a well-established fact. They are giving him the benefit of the doubt that ought to be reserved for honest researchers, which Rossi certainly is not.
I find it very interesting that the only times there were competent outsiders at tests (NASA and Quantum) that Rossi was apparently unable to get his gadget to work. Maybe he was worried that they would see through his trick.
Even Focardi admits that he doesn’t know how Rossi’s E-Cats are made or how they work.
***Feel free to provide evidence for this assertion.
None of the other scientists you mentioned (nor anyone else) has a clue about what’s going on inside and E-Cat.
***Feel free to provide evidence for this assertion as well.
I’ve read and seen several instances where one of the scientists you’ve mentioned above has taken a totally unsubstantiated claim from Rossi and treated it as though it were a well-established fact.
***Feel free to provide evidence for this assertion as well.
I find it very interesting that the only times there were competent outsiders at tests (NASA and Quantum) that Rossi was apparently unable to get his gadget to work.
***Wrong. At least for NASA. Their position is that it did not operate in Heat After Death mode for more than 6 hours, which was their arbitrary cutoff point. Any device operating for more than an hour in HAD mode is proof enough for the average researcher, but NASA is playing politics here.