Triple wrote: “I am glad Leo addressed this propaganda so quickly...”
Does it not dawn on you that lawyers who face-plant in court every single time might not be your best source of legal analysis? Donofrio’s self-administered fleecing in his latest birthed-related case left him so bitter he vowed never again to willing go to federal court.
“Does the fogbow crowd still want to hang their hats on this memo?”
I expect they’ll be O.K. with a report by the Congressional Research Service agreeing with them and Leo Donofrio not. In any case, the report is for Congress. I doubt members of Congress take much legal advice from either Fogbow or Donofrio.
But it begs the question as to "why"?? Congress didn't care about the definition of NBC in 2008. Why do they care now?? Why do they need a report that expands the definition beyond even the most twisted interpretation of Wong Kim Ark?? And why do we take the legal advice of one guy, when a 9-0 decision defined NBC exclusively as all children born in the country to parents who were its citizens??? Jack Maskell does NOT trump the Supreme Court.
I notice that you did not refute the substance of Leo’s claim - that the CRS report contains badly misrepresented false quotes that bias the findings of the report.
Gee, I wonder why...NOT!