As someone who has contributed to his campaign... Disappointed. If not true, he needs a better way to respond. He is not instilling confidence.
He responded by telling the truth.
Until there is proof otherwise, I believe him.
I was brought up that people are innocent until proven guilty. And he has been proven guilty of nothing, not in any of these allegations.
I have not yet contributed to his campaign, and do not have a dog in the internecine squabble.
There isn’t much more that he can say besides “no, this isn’t true”. It won’t satisfy anyone who is enamored with another candidate, or who enjoys public gossip and accusations without proof.
I thought we here at FR were about conservative values. That doesn’t mean we expect our fellows to be as pure as the driven snow, but it does mean that we expect them to hold our values as important goals that we strive to attain.
I see good things about all our candidates when I listen to the debates, and I see flaws in all of them. It is not time yet to form a circular shooting squad over our preferences.
Let’s be aware of the wolves in our midst, who are circling, watching, trying to divide us, and conquer. If you do not think there are wolves among us, you are silly sheep, easily spooked.
We have many weeks to go, and more debates to consider. Each of us can vote our consciences when it is our turn. In the meantime, let’s stick to policies, ideas, and issues.
Let’s not disparage our bench, for each has strengths, and each has weaknesses. Please stick to the ideas, and not attack the candidates personally.
The other side will do enough of that, and they are doing it here.
Gotta agree.
He allegedly has America’s most feared lawyer, ready to attack.
So. What’s he waiting for?
Attack. Bankrupt a few of these accusers.